#1 Burning Software

It is currently Sat May 18, 2024 12:29 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: StarBurn X - PQ vs Raw PW
PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 2:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 5:28 pm
Posts: 68
Good morning

I'm playing with StarBurnX... trying to figure out why my burns are so slow and take so much CPU.

I'm trying to create Redbook Audio CDs.

I've found, using the samples, that the Audio Burner has two DAO modes - PQ and Raw PW. Using PQ is quick and doesn't take that much CPU. Raw PW is slow and eats up 100% CPU. In both cases I was burning a 35 minute MP3 encoded at 128kbps.

That gives me a few questions:

1. What is the difference between the two modes?
2. Which mode is better for producing a Redbook audio CD that is playable in all CD players (not just PCs)?
3. Which mode is more supported on CD Writers?

Many thanks!
- Shaun


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 7:18 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 12:03 am
Posts: 4089
Location: British Virgin Islands
1) Burning 96 bytes of the RAW P-Q-R-S-T-U-V-W subchannel Vs. burning of the 16 bytes of the cooked P and Q subchannel (drive's hardware generates rest of the bits).

2) and 3) DAO96 is better and more supported. DAO16 is nearly obsolete.

However... BOTH these modes should take the same amount of the CPU power as encoding is pretty much the same. So there's something else. Can you double check this before we'll do?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: My Bad
PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 1:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 5:28 pm
Posts: 68
I did some more testing and there is a distinct difference in the pattern of CPU usage jumpting between 100% and 0% but it's not as drastic as I first seemed to observe.

Also, I seem to have been wrong about the speed difference. I setup a more controlled test and ended up with 6 seconds difference in a 12 minute burn. That's a 0.8% difference, accounted for by various background services.

Here's what I found: (Start time, observation, duration before change of state)

StarBurnX Disc at Once Raw
9:55:45 Immediate Buffer Status c. 50% 0:00:30
9:56:15 CPU Maxed 0:04:00
10:00:15 Memory Use Climbs 0:00:35
10:00:50 CPU Low 0:00:25
10:01:15 Burn Starts, CPU Maxed 0:03:05
10:04:20 Progress jumps to max 0:03:15
10:07:35 CPU Low 0:00:20
10:07:55 Burn Complete Messagebox

StarBurnX Disc at Once PQ
9:36:39 Start (CPU Maxed) 0:04:21
9:41:00 Memorary Started to Climb (CPU Low) 0:01:10
9:42:10 Buffer Increased, Burn Started 0:02:50
9:45:00 CPU Maxed, Progress Bar at Max 0:03:55
9:48:55 Burn Complete Messagebox

My PC is an Athlon 64 3500+ w/1GB of RAM.
Start to Finish time on a lesser machine (PIII 800mhz 256MB) can reach close to half-an-hour.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:22 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 12:03 am
Posts: 4089
Location: British Virgin Islands
Takes time b/c of the compressed audio handling. WAV burning should be more or less the same on all of the machines.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group