#1 Burning Software

It is currently Sun Jan 20, 2019 8:21 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 67 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Looking for certain features
PostPosted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 6:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:00 pm
Posts: 542
Hi,

in the course of switching from NMS burning library to StarBurn I'll pobably search for couple of features. These already occurred me:

- Setting the file system type of data images (ISO level, Joliet/UDF/ISO)
- When verifying data discs, how can I find out which files failed verification?
- Can I set the hidden attribute of files and folders on data discs?
- Can I set the date of files and folders on data discs?

Do these features already exist? And if so, where can I find them?

Thanks in advance :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Looking for certain features
PostPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 6:48 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 12:03 am
Posts: 4089
Location: British Virgin Islands
1) ISO9660 and UDF have different tree creation calls. If you want to create ISO9660 (+Joliet) you need to call:

StarBurn_ISO9660JolietFileTree_Create(...)

and ISO level is selected with the last BOOL in the parameters list (IN BOOLEAN p__BOOLEAN__IsLevel2). For UDF
you need to call:

StarBurn_UDF2_VolumeCreate(...)

2) Unfortunately in StarBurn we do report only LBA (logical block address) and size of failed region rather then the
content located as this place. We'll think about how to implement what you want.

3) StarBurn_ISO9660JolietFileTree_GetAttributes(...) and matched StarBurn_ISO9660JolietFileTree_SetAttributes(...)
change file attribtes for ISO9660 (+Joliet) and the same set exists for UDF.

4) StarBurn_UDF2_FileDirectoryDateTimeGet(...) and StarBurn_UDF2_FileDirectoryDateTimeSet(...) do what you want
for UDF and the same set exists for ISO9660 (+Joliet).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Looking for certain features
PostPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:00 pm
Posts: 542
OK...but is 1, 3 and 4 still missing in StarBurnX?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Looking for certain features
PostPosted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 2:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 8:44 am
Posts: 609
Hello,

1) Functionality requested in sections 3 and 4 still missing in StarBurnX;

2) Concerning to section 1 ... you should use the UDFDataBurner to make UDF discs and the DataBurner to make the ISO+Joliette discs;

Regards,

Dmitry


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Looking for certain features
PostPosted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 2:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:00 pm
Posts: 542
Ah, I see. Thanks for the information.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Looking for certain features
PostPosted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:02 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 12:03 am
Posts: 4089
Location: British Virgin Islands
We'll catch up with StarBurnX after V12 release.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Looking for certain features
PostPosted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 8:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 1:50 pm
Posts: 394
anton (staff) wrote:
1) ISO9660 and UDF have different tree creation calls. If you want to create ISO9660 (+Joliet) you need to call:

StarBurn_ISO9660JolietFileTree_Create(...)

and ISO level is selected with the last BOOL in the parameters list (IN BOOLEAN p__BOOLEAN__IsLevel2). For UDF
you need to call:

StarBurn_UDF2_VolumeCreate(...)

2) Unfortunately in StarBurn we do report only LBA (logical block address) and size of failed region rather then the
content located as this place. We'll think about how to implement what you want.

3) StarBurn_ISO9660JolietFileTree_GetAttributes(...) and matched StarBurn_ISO9660JolietFileTree_SetAttributes(...)
change file attribtes for ISO9660 (+Joliet) and the same set exists for UDF.

4) StarBurn_UDF2_FileDirectoryDateTimeGet(...) and StarBurn_UDF2_FileDirectoryDateTimeSet(...) do what you want
for UDF and the same set exists for ISO9660 (+Joliet).


Hello Dima Sir,
1) Are above discussed 1, 3 & 4 functionality available for use for DataBurner(ISO/Joliet).
2) What about 2nd request(name of file for which verification failed)?
3) I was looking & had requested for the same functionality in another thread. But this topic seemed to be active. Hence I am requesting here.
Thank you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Looking for certain features
PostPosted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 3:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 8:44 am
Posts: 609
Yes, this feature is not implemented yet in SDK ... sorry.

Regards,

Dmitry


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Looking for certain features
PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 11:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 1:50 pm
Posts: 394
Any updates?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Looking for certain features
PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 2:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 8:44 am
Posts: 609
Hello,

Features 3 & 4 planned to next StarBurnX version!

Regards,

Dmitry


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Looking for certain features
PostPosted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 3:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 1:50 pm
Posts: 394
Hello Sir,
1) Today I will look into the newer build. Thank you.
2) I want to use DVD Authoring SDK to create a create & author videos. Is StarBurn has any Authoring SDK? :)
3) If no, then will you please kindly suggest me one that I can use in VB.NET? :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Looking for certain features
PostPosted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 5:49 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 12:03 am
Posts: 4089
Location: British Virgin Islands
Unfortunately we don't do DVD Authoring stuff. I've sent you a couple of links to your e-mail.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Drives not enumerate until refresh called
PostPosted: Sat Apr 24, 2010 3:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 1:50 pm
Posts: 394
Hello Dima Sir,

1) In the newer dlls. Drives are not enumerate, until refresh called at the time of making an object of starburnX.
2) Until now, When I was initializing the starBurnX, I was initializing drives also directly without refreshing starBurnX.
3) But in these dlls drives are not enumearted. [Actually I am facing another problem of C++ unhandled exception while refreshing drives, which I am already discussing with you in another topic so want to avoid calling refresh. Until I am not fixing the problem by applying suggested solution.]
4) For work arounding this I tried to refresh starBurn & then again I tried to enumerate drives. At this time drives got enumearted.
5) So is this the case that I have to refresh starBurn each time before getting drives collection. Like following:
Code:
If m_drivesBuff Is Nothing Then
            m_drivesBuff.refresh()
            m_drivesBuff = m_starBurnX.Drives
        End If

Thank you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Looking for certain features
PostPosted: Mon Apr 26, 2010 5:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 8:44 am
Posts: 609
Hello,

Yes, You should manually call the Refresh function to enumerate optical drives!!

Regards,

Dmitry


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Looking for certain features
PostPosted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 6:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 1:50 pm
Posts: 394
OK. Thank you Sir.

1) So now onwards, before calling drive enumeration means m_starBurnX.Drives, I will refresh starBurnX object.
2) But Sir the possible problem which I am already facing I want to discuss with you.
Now for a drive which takes time to disc, it will take a lot of time to first refresh its information and then collect its information.
3) Even there are some cases in which disc in the drive is never detected & m_starBurnX.Refresh() never ends.

I think to give some timeout for refresh is the solution for this problem. But in this case you have to save current starburnX object in some temporary variable. If timeouts in refresh call then all the saved values before refresh you have to set to StarBurnX again.

I tried to do this in from my side but it is not working as refresh call never returns. It hangs the sample. So I think you can help me for this problem with above proposed solution.

Am I clear Sir.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 67 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group